NBN vs Wireless? Not likely.

The Government plans to have the 100mbit fibre optic NBN operational nationally in 8 years time and already its looking to be superseded before its totally operational.

NBN Co bought radio spectrum licenses from Austar the other day for $120 million to enable NBN Co to provide satellite internet to those who won’t be connected to the NBN or wireless. And then there is the other $43 billion.

Telstra the other day announced its planning to roll out LTE wireless technology soon and has conducted lab and field trials with Huawei. The lab trials achieved real world speeds of 150mbit on 20MHz of bandwidth while the field trials on 10MHz of bandwidth achieved nearly 70mbit. Telstra have also previously confirmed their 3G HSDPA network will be upgraded to 84mbit theoretical speeds this year.

Telstra’s announcement prompted Optus & Vodafone to also confirm they’re conducting trials with Huawei and will likely serve to rush the market into adopting faster 3G and LTE.

I also wonder about the public safety aspect of the NBN. Mobile phones have batteries these days that last days to weeks on standby, or hours when used in calls. The NBN requires battery backup systems to be employed in every home to ensure phone services will operate during a power outage. It will become a huge issue in the future with people unable to call emergency services in a power outage because their battery backup simply didn’t last long enough or the battery has not been replaced and does not hold charge.

So when ADSL2+ can deliver a maximum of 24mbit, and significantly faster wireless is coming in the next 2 years – there seems little point adopting the NBN (at least at 100mbit speeds). Its simply too little too late. I’m predicting that most will migrate to wireless services as their primary connection before the NBN is fully operational as it will simply be better than ADSL.

The unrealistic fears of Mobile Phones

telstra_mobile_phone_towerThere was a recent article in the local paper a few weeks ago titled “Mobile phone tower fight at Katoomba” which expressed the fears of seven people of a development proposal for a Mobile phone tower on Woodlands Rd, Katoomba.

Emma Schofield stated “We’ve got a school probably 350 metres away, a hospital not much further I think with so many inconclusive and unsubstantiated results and studies, we should be really careful”.

I found it interesting that an article was published without inspecting the geographical facts. North Katoomba Public School is more like 400m from the Colless Foods site and the Hospital is 350m away – something that can easily be measured with a tool like Google Earth.

There also is in fact already a radio site at the Hospital offering several frequencies of a power higher than the proposal by Telstra for this new mobile phone tower. A further two radio sites for Integral Energy and the NSW Rural Fire Service are on Showground Lane some 400m from the Hospital and 600m from the School.

While we are concerned about inconclusive and unsubstantiated results I also find it interesting that Barton St and Victoria St which both surround the North Katoomba Public School have high voltage power lines, lines that equipment used by Integral Energy is subject to routine quarantines to remove magnetic energy – yet no such quarantine system is employed by the telecommunications industry as the energy exposure is much less.

Optus currently considers the Hospital and North Katoomba Public School to be in strong signal meaning both sites are already exposed to significant amounts of mobile phone signals.

Even without electricity we are exposed to radiation continually from both our Sun, other stars, and the microwave background.

The study of safe radiation dosages is based on observations of the health effects from the Hiroshima atomic bomb which was a high dosage. Health effects from lower dosages was assumed to be linear and its not exactly known if the assumptions are correct – which is something that is potentially being disproven after the Chenobyl nuclear accident as there has not been enough deaths to line up with the radiation dosages chart.

While the reception issues that Telstra wish to clear up will effect hundreds, if not thousands of homes, and provide mobile phone reception in a bushland area not already covered which will provide improved public safety.

So whats all the fear about? I’m not so sure. If mobile phones scare you, maybe you should move west of Bathurst, because you will be exposed to electromagnetic energy if you like it or not – and there is no conclusive evidence to suggest this exposure is harmful in any way.

Australian Broadband Survey 2011

whirlpool-australianbroadbandsurvey2011

Whirlpool are currently conducting the yearly Australian Broadband Survey.

As always I’ve completed the survey some ISPs tend to view the survey results and try to better their offerings based on the suggestions.

One question I found interesting this year was “Is there anything you dislike about your ISP’s terms of service?” which I answered “ISP does change conditions frequently”. It seems that John Linton of Exetel likes to change the plans every 3 months, sometimes for better or worse. It’d be nice if pricing were stable.

Also since last year my line sync speed has risen from 7000/384 to 8100/1024 due to upgrading to ADSL2+. Telstra Wholesale decided to improve their offerings for ADSL2+ last year and thus many ISPs signed up to their ADSL2+ products which they did not previously offer.

Post Master General does e-mail?

It seems the Post Master General is still in existence. At least if you believed the absolute morons who refuse to acknowledge there is any other telephone carrier in Australia other than Telstra.

Sure Telstra own 98% of all copper lines in Australia… however few are aware the ACCC effectively controls Telstra retail & wholesale pricing so that Telstra resellers are able to compete with Telstra retail. In simple terms, the competitive offers are not with Telstra and any competitive offer from Telstra will likely see it withdrawn very quickly after a flood of lawsuits. So it can’t be price as Telstra is typically double the price of any other carrier.

“But Telstra have the best service!”. I’m not sure how anybody could say this either. NextG is the only word that needs to be said.

When NextG first kicked off, Bigpond started offering Wireless Broadband to everyone claiming coverage is available in their area. During this time I made a decent salary with on-site calls to confirm there is no coverage, and that the modem has to be returned to Telstra. At the time Telstra claimed that a result of no coverage with Wireless meant the customer could only exchange the wireless modem for an Bigpond ADSL service that was double the original cost. No refund was possible. The Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman found this quite interesting and helped several of my customers receive a complete refund and expenses to cover my invoices.

Recently I’m seeing another problem with NextG – shit hardware. Sierra Wireless 880U & Maxon BP-USB devices often fail to work on brand new computers. Why? Bigpond seem to encourage the customer frequently reconnect the modem device… and do not ship the modem with a $1 USB extension lead. Therefore, the USB connectors wear out very quickly.

The latest trend for Bigpond Technical Support (13 3933 – tell them I sent you!) is to forward you to Gizmo. Bigpond does this when they decide they’re incapable of helping you. Gizmo charges $99 per hour for telephone support – often due to simple problems that Bigpond staff should be aware of, or faulty hardware which Bigpond staff should be familiar with identifying. $99 an hour for telephone support is quite laughable since my firm charges half this. Maybe I should bump up the rates.

Yet my firm offers technical support for the significantly cheaper phone and Internet products resold by Telstra… locally and free of charge. There are no Telstra stores in my area. My firm doesn’t just support the hardware we sell – but endeavour to support any hardware the customer may be using. Being familiar with our area, we don’t attempt to sell products that a customer cannot obtain anyway – we research our claims before we make them. Similar stories are true of many other Telstra resellers. My firm only resells Telstra services because its conveinent for support reasons – yet very few can understand this reasoning and still believe Telstra will offer a better grade of support (even though they call us to do it, and get billed for it).

There is also Bigpond E-mail. Bigpond have quite a reputation of being the biggest contributor to spam in Australia. In fact the “dynamic addressing” of their network makes it harder to identify spammers on the Bigpond network. They have had several national outages that have lasted from minutes to days. Bigpond does not offer virus or spam filtering without an extra cost. And, by using Bigpond mail it makes it much harder to change Internet companies. You can in effect get a better service from Google or Hotmail for free that is not tied to your broadband invoice. But still, somehow Bigpond E-mail is better than Australia Post.

A copper telephone is still required in order to have an ADSL connection due to Telstra policies. However VoIP is actually booming right now as its only a fraction of the cost to make calls, and results in significant savings, even when a VoIP account is added to the monthly invoices. Some people when they hear the word “VoIP” immediately put you in the same basket as Indian telemarketers. Have these people never made international calls and realized there is a latency? It is not the technology that creates the latency, but its the distance. VoIP is likely to be the only form of a conventional telephone service available, in the not to distant future. Telstra will likely fight VoIP feircely as their copper network is designed entirely around carrying voice signals. VoIP and the National Broadband Network will pose a serious threat to Telstra revenues if the NBN is ever built.

Excess charges is a huge reason to not go with Telstra. Bigpond Internet have a standard charge of around 14c per megabyte for excess downloads, which equates to $140 per gigabyte. Yet Telstra resellers can do it for a couple dollars. Its completely unreasonable to charge these kinds of prices and is a marketting trap in my opinion.

So back to my original complaint about Telstra. Why is there no other option other than Telstra? From my point of view, Telstra is not an option. I ask you – how do I signup to the Post Master General? The service you describe is nothing like my description of Telstra. My description of Telstra is: unethical, overpriced & poor service. I wonder which carrier Telstra staff choose…

Bigpond Sports is Anti-Competitive Behaviour

Bathurst1000-2009start

As the V8s race around the mountain this weekend for the Bathurst 1000 I’m once again frustrated with Telstra Bigpond. I’m surprised that its gone on for so many years.

Bathurst 1000 supposedly attracts international interest. Certainly I can imagine Australians overseas wanting to keep in touch with Australian events. Its amusing how there is little mention of which channels air Bathurst 1000 overseas – probably because they’re all PayTV channels.

So if you live overseas and want to watch Bathurst, you have to be a PayTV subscriber. This requires you to have a physical coax line installed in your home from the street, or requires you to install a satellite dish. Not exactly a temporarily rig. But Bathurst is only a yearly event. Surely there is a market for online streaming.

And there is. Telstra Bigpond signed an exclusive coverage contract for the online arena. However Telstra Bigpond do not offer video streaming as a product of its own, but require you to have a Telstra Bigpond Broadband Internet connection. So in other words, if you live overseas, don’t wish to subscribe to PayTV for those other 11 months of the year, and want to watch Bathurst… stiff shit.

Bathurst1000-2007helicopter